-65f09d005d944.jpeg)
William James
Date of Birth | : | 11 Jan, 1842 |
Date of Death | : | 26 Aug, 1910 |
Place of Birth | : | New York, New York, United States |
Profession | : | American Philosopher, Psychologist |
Nationality | : | American |
First half of life
working life
The family
Writings
Epistemology
James defines true faith as that which proves effective for the believer. His realist theory of truth was a synthesis of the correspondence theory of truth and the coherence theory of truth, with an additional dimension. Truth can be verified to the extent that thoughts and statements correspond to real things, as well as to the extent that they "hang together" or fit together, as pieces of a puzzle fit together; They are verified by the observed results of applying a concept in real practice.
Even the most ancient parts of truth were once plastic. They are called truths for human reasons. They still mediated between earlier truths and what were then novel observations. Purely objective truth, truth in the establishment of which the satisfaction of man by marrying the earlier part of experience with the new, played no part, is nowhere to be found. The reasons we call true are the reasons why they are true, because 'being true' simply means performing this marriage-work.
—"Pragmatism's Conception of Truth," Pragmatism (1907), p. 83.
James held a world view in line with realism, declaring that the value of any truth depends entirely on the use of the person who holds it. Additional tenets of James' realism include the view that the world is a mosaic of different experiences that can only be properly interpreted and understood through the application of 'radical empiricism'. Radical empiricism, not related to everyday scientific empiricism, insists that the world and experience can never be stopped for completely objective analysis; The mind of the observer and the act of observation influence any empirical approach to truth. Mind, its experience and nature are inseparable. James's emphasis on diversity as the default human condition—as opposed to duality, especially Hegelian dialectical duality—remained a powerful influence in American culture. James' description of the mind-world connection, which he described in terms of 'stream of consciousness', had a direct and significant influence on avant-garde and modernist literature and art, particularly James Joyce.
Doctrine will believe
In William James's 1896 lecture entitled "The Will to Believe," James defends the right to violate the principle of evidentialism in order to justify the hypothesis enterprise. This idea presaged 20th-century objections to evidencialism and sought to justify belief in an unwavering principle that would prove more beneficial. Through his philosophy of pragmatism, William James justified religious belief by using the results of his speculative ventures as evidence to support the truth of the hypothesis. Therefore, this doctrine allows one to presuppose belief in God and prove his existence by what that belief brings to one's life.
It was criticized by rationalists of skepticism, such as Bertrand Russell in Free Thought and Official Propaganda and Alfred Henry Lloyd with The Will to Doubt. Both argued that one must always adhere to fallibilism, recognizing in all human knowledge that "none of our beliefs is completely true; all have at least a portion of ambiguity and error," and that the only way to progress closer to truth is never to assume certainty, but always Examining all aspects and trying to arrive at a decision objectively.
Instinct
Like Sigmund Freud, James was influenced by Charles Darwin's theory of natural selection. At the core of James' theory of psychology, defined in The Principles of Psychology (1890), was a system of "instincts". James wrote that humans had many instincts, even more so than other animals. These instincts, he said, could be overridden by experience and one another, because many instincts were actually in conflict with each other. In the 1920s, however, psychology moved away from evolutionary theory and embraced radical behaviorism.
Theory of Emotion
James is one of the two names of James-Lange's theory of emotion, which he formulated independently of Karl Lange in the 1880s. This theory holds that emotion is the mind's perception of a physiological state that results from some stimulus. In James' oft-cited example, it is not that we see a bear, get scared, and run; We see a bear and run; As a result, we fear bears. Emotions are our mind's perception of elevated adrenaline levels, heartbeat, etc.
This way of thinking about emotion has great consequences for the philosophy of aesthetics as well as the philosophy and practice of education. Here is a passage from his work, The Principles of Psychology, that spells out those conclusions:
It must immediately be emphasized that the aesthetic emotion, pure and simple, the pleasure given to us by certain lines and masses and combinations of colors and sounds, is an absolutely sensational experience, an optical or auricular feeling which is primary, and not because it reacts behind other sensations successively stimulated elsewhere. . To this simple primary and immediate pleasure in certain pure sensations and their harmonious combinations, it may be added true, secondary pleasures; And these secondary pleasures play a large part in the practical enjoyment of works of art by the masses of mankind. The more classic one's tastes are, however, the less relatively important are the secondary pleasures experienced than the primary ones.
Emotion theory was also developed independently by the anthropologist Giuseppe Sergi in Italy.
See Social Darwinism
When James accepted Darwin's theory of biological evolution, he considered the social Darwinism promoted by philosophers such as Herbert Spencer to be a sham. He was highly skeptical of applying Darwin's theory of natural selection to human society in a way that placed the Anglo-Saxons at the top of the hierarchy. James's rejection of social Darwinism was a minority opinion at Harvard in the 1870s and 1880s.
See on Spiritualism and Sangamism
James studied closely the schools of thought known as associationism and spiritualism. An associationist's view is that each experience that leads to one leads to another, creating a chain of events. Association does not connect two concepts, but physical objects. This association occurs at an atomic level. Small physical changes occur in the brain that eventually form complex ideas or associations. Thinking is created as these complex ideas work together and lead to new experiences. Both Isaac Newton and David Hartley were pioneers of this school of thought, proposing the idea that "the bodily vibrations of the brain, spinal cord, and nerves are the basis of all sensation, all perception, and all motion..." With association he believed it was very simple. He refers to associationism as "psychology without a soul" because there is nothing in the creation of ideas; They are created by simply connecting objects to each other.
On the other hand, a spiritualist believes that mental phenomena are attributed to the soul. Whereas in associationism, ideas and behavior are separate, in spiritualism, they are connected. Spirituality includes the term instinctualism, which suggests that ideas cause behavior. Perceptions of past behavior influence a person's behavior in the future; All these ideas are tied together by spirit. Therefore, an inner self causes one to have a thought, which leads them to perform a behavior, and the memory of past behavior determines how one will act in the future.
James had strong opinions about all these schools of thought. He was, by nature, a pragmatist and thus took the view that the parts of the theory that made the most sense and could be proven should be used. Therefore, he recommended separating Spiritualism and Sanghvaism and using the parts of them that made the most sense. James believed that every person has a soul, which exists in a spiritual universe, and leads a person to perform behaviors in the physical world. James was influenced by Emanuel Swedenborg, who first introduced him to the concept. James said that, although it appears that people use associations to move from one event to another, this cannot be done without the spirit uniting everything together. Because, after an association is formed, it is the person who decides which part of it to focus on and therefore the direction in which the following associations will be directed. Associationism is very simple in that it does not account for decisions about future behavior, and memories of what worked well and what didn't. Spirituality, however, does not exhibit an actual physical representation for how association occurs. James combined the views of Spiritualism and Sanghaism to create his own way of thinking. James discusses soft-minded thinkers as religious, optimistic, dogmatic, and monistic. Hard-hearted thinkers were irreligious, pessimistic, pluralistic and skeptical. Sane-minded individuals believing in God and universal order were seen as natural believers. Those who focused on human misery and suffering were identified as sick souls.
Quotes
Most unhappiness is caused because people listen to themselves... instead of talking to themselves.
Truth is what will be steadily borne out by subsequent experience
The greatest revolution of our generation is the discovery that human beings, by changing the inner attitudes of their minds, can change the outer aspects of their lives.
Thoughts become perception, perception becomes reality. Alter your thoughts, alter your reality.
The greatest weapon against stress is our ability to choose one thought over another.
Our view of the world is truly shaped by what we decide to hear.
A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices.
There is a law in psychology that if you form a picture in your mind of what you would like to be, and you keep and hold that picture there long enough, you will soon become exactly as you have been thinking.
The deepest principle in human nature is the craving to be appreciated.
A winner's attitude: it may be difficult, but it's possible. A loser's attitude: It may be possible, but it's too difficult.